Adeptiv AI raises $100K in Angel Funding to accelerate effortless enterprise AI Governance for businesses.

Get A Demo
2026 Platform Comparison

Adeptiv AI vs Modulos AI

Two purpose-built AI governance platforms. Distinct architectures, distinct governance philosophies. This analysis supports informed procurement decisions across lifecycle governance, risk quantification, compliance, and runtime monitoring.

Request A Demo
Explore Platform
Global AI Regulations covered by Adeptiv AI
0 +
Real-time production monitoring metrics
0 +
Frameworks
Modulos AI
0 +
GRC efficiency
Modulos AI
0 x
AI-Native Platform

Adeptiv AI

Unified operational AI lifecycle governance — from discovery and inventory through risk, compliance, real-time monitoring, and audit readiness.

AI Lifecycle Governance
38+ Regulations
30+ Real-Time Metrics
BFSI · Healthcare · Mfg
Enterprise GRC Platform

Modulos AI

GRC-first Governance Graph — one control satisfies multiple frameworks simultaneously, powered by AI agents that compress compliance workloads.

Governance Graph
14+ Frameworks
AI Agent Suite
ISO 42001 · SOC 2 Type II

Capability-by-capability breakdown

Verified against publicly available platform documentation

Capability Adeptiv AI Modulos AI Advantage
Governance Model Integrated lifecycle — inventory → risk → compliance → real-time monitoring in one workflow Governance Graph — frameworks, requirements, controls, and evidence in one connected structure Context-dep.
AI Inventory Dedicated module with risk classifications, regulatory obligations, and lifecycle status by business unit Project & org dashboards with lifecycle stage tracking and ownership workflows Both Strong
Shadow AI Detection Unregistered systems discovered within broader lifecycle governance workflow Dedicated module covering 6 detection surfaces — SaaS-embedded AI, autonomous agents, convenience bypass Both Strong
Risk Quantification Qualitative classifications mapped to regulatory obligations Monetary exposure (EUR/CHF/USD) via Monte Carlo simulation; probability distributions, not point estimates ✦ Modulos
Framework Coverage 38+ regulations incl. BFSI and healthcare sector-specific frameworks 14+ pre-built frameworks — EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, GDPR, NIS2, DORA, ISO 27001 ✦ Adeptiv AI
Multi-Framework Efficiency Compliance mapping across 38+ regulations within integrated platform Governance Graph: one control satisfies multiple frameworks simultaneously — eliminates duplicate work ✦ Modulos
Real-Time Monitoring Dedicated monitoring across 30+ production metrics with continuous risk detection Continuous Runtime Inspection™ — results feed compliance controls; model behavior tracked against policies ✦ Adeptiv AI
AI Agent Suite Risk assessment and compliance workflow automation within integrated platform Scout, Control Assessment Agent (2–4 hrs → 5 min), Evidence Agent (15–30 min → 2 min), Risk Agent ✦ Modulos
BFSI Readiness Dedicated BFSI use cases — credit risk, investment research AI; EU AI Act Annex III; regulatory examination documentation DORA and NIS2 integration; monetary risk quantification applicable to financial risk reporting Both Strong
Certifications Enterprise-grade platform ISO/IEC 42001:2023 certified · SOC 2 Type II · EU AI Pact signatory ✦ Modulos
Multi-Jurisdictional 38+ regulation coverage for multinational organizations spanning multiple geographies EU-first but multi-framework; strong for organizations across ISO, NIST, and EU regulatory ecosystems ✦ Adeptiv AI

Where the platforms diverge most

Six capability areas where architectural differences carry meaningful strategic implications for enterprise procurement teams.

01

Risk Assessment & Quantification

Qualitative vs. Financial Risk Framing
Adeptiv AI
  • Gap analysis integrated into compliance workflow
  • Qualitative classifications mapped to regulatory obligations
  • Risk informs documentation and monitoring priorities
Modulos AI
  • Monetary exposure (EUR/CHF/USD) via Monte Carlo simulation
  • Risk appetite limits with automated threshold alerts
  • Risk Agent automates Fermi estimation with full audit trail
02

Compliance & Multi-Framework Efficiency

Regulatory Breadth vs. Architectural Efficiency
Adeptiv AI
  • 38+ global regulations including BFSI and healthcare frameworks
  • Automated compliance mapping generates audit-ready reports
  • Designed for complex multi-jurisdictional obligation profiles
Modulos AI
  • Governance Graph: one control satisfies EU AI Act + ISO 42001 + NIST + NIS2 + DORA simultaneously
  • Control Assessment Agent: 2–4 hours → ~5 minutes per control
  • 14+ pre-built framework mappings with version pinning
03

Runtime Monitoring & Observability

Operational Breadth vs. Compliance-Linked Monitoring
Adeptiv AI
  • Dedicated real-time monitoring across 30+ production metrics
  • Continuous risk detection in regulated deployments
  • Broader operational observability for traditionally deployed models
Modulos AI
  • Continuous Runtime Inspection™ — test results link directly to compliance controls
  • Control owners notified on test failure; compliance posture updates in real time
  • Drift quantified in monetary exposure and linked to control notifications
04

GRC Automation & AI Agents

Integrated Workflow vs. Dedicated Agent Suite
Adeptiv AI
  • Governance co-pilot model embeds automation within operational tasks
  • Workflow automation reduces manual steps in documentation and reporting
Modulos AI
  • Scout: compliance Q&A across GitHub, Confluence, Jira, Drive
  • Control Assessment Agent: ~5 min vs. 2–4 hrs per control
  • Evidence Agent: ~2 min vs. 15–30 min per document; all outputs require human review
05

Shadow AI Detection & Governance

Integrated Discovery vs. Dedicated Detection Framework
Adeptiv AI
  • AI inventory discovery encompasses unregistered systems
  • Discovery integrated within lifecycle governance workflow
Modulos AI
  • Dedicated module covering 6 detection surfaces
  • Covers SaaS-embedded AI (~70% of interactions by 2026), autonomous agents, senior-level defiant usage
  • Detection signals mapped to EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIS2, DORA
06

Audit Readiness & Evidence Architecture

Examination Defensibility vs. Evidence Architecture
Adeptiv AI
  • Audit-ready reports designed for regulatory examination defensibility
  • Documentation covers full evidence chain across 38+ frameworks
  • BFSI-focused for financial regulator scrutiny
Modulos AI
  • Immutable evidence browser with version control and full audit trail
  • Controls lock on execution; reopening requires explicit justification
  • On-demand PDF audit packages; Evidence Agent auto-generates metadata

Framework coverage matrix

Verified against publicly available documentation. Confirm specific coverage with each vendor before procurement decisions.

Framework Adeptiv AI Modulos AI
EU AI Act ✓ Confirmed — incl. Annex III BFSI use cases ✓ Confirmed — pre-built mappings, runtime compliance
ISO 42001 ✓ Confirmed ✓ Confirmed — ISO/IEC 42001:2023 certified organization
NIST AI RMF ✓ Confirmed ✓ Confirmed — pre-built framework mapping
GDPR ✓ Confirmed ✓ Confirmed — pre-built mapping
DORA ~ Verify with vendor ✓ Confirmed — pre-built framework mapping
NIS2 ~ Verify with vendor ✓ Confirmed — pre-built framework mapping
OECD AI Principles ✓ Confirmed ~ Not listed as primary framework
ISO 27001 ~ Verify with vendor ✓ Confirmed — pre-built mapping
Sector-Specific Banking & Resilience (DORA) ✓ Confirmed — dedicated BFSI regulatory coverage ~ Covered via DORA/EU AI Act; verify depth
Healthcare AI (WHO Guidelines & CA SB 1120 / AB 3030) ✓ Confirmed — dedicated healthcare use cases ~ Verify with vendor

Which platform fits which operational environment?

Regulatory depth, operational risk, and audit expectations differ materially across sectors. This is platform fit analysis.

🏦

Banking & Financial Services

Overlapping AI, ICT, and risk reporting obligations under regulatory examination

Adeptiv AI

Dedicated BFSI use cases — credit risk governance, investment research AI under EU AI Act Annex III. Audit-ready documentation for the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), the Data Protection Act 2023, and national banking regulators across multiple jurisdictions.

Modulos AI

DORA + NIS2 + EU AI Act integrated natively. Monetary quantification aligns with financial risk reporting standards. Risk appetite frameworks map to board-level AI governance requirements.

🏥

Healthcare

Clinical AI explainability, performance drift detection, and unsanctioned tool adoption

Adeptiv AI

Documented EHR and patient summary AI use cases. Real-time monitoring detects performance drift in patient-facing applications. Governance for safe, explainable, auditable clinical AI.

Modulos AI

Monetary quantification applicable where risk magnitude must be expressed for clinical risk committees. Shadow AI governance directly relevant in healthcare where unsanctioned tool adoption is widespread.

⚙️

Manufacturing & Aviation

Safety-critical AI with multi-jurisdictional obligations and immediate operational consequence

Adeptiv AI

Real-time monitoring critical where performance degradation has safety implications. Multi-jurisdiction coverage for global manufacturing operations.

Modulos AI

ISO 42001 certification aligns with industrial quality management cultures. Monetary quantification supports risk prioritization against operational budget and safety investment decisions.

🔒

Insurance

Actuarial AI governance, underwriting model oversight, and cross-jurisdictional compliance

Adeptiv AI

Covers underwriting, claims automation, and fraud detection. Audit-ready documentation for insurance regulatory examinations. 38+ regulations for multinational insurers.

Modulos AI

Monetary quantification directly applicable to actuarial systems. DORA + EU AI Act for European insurers. Risk appetite frameworks align to underwriting risk tolerance standards.

🌐

Telecommunications & Utilities

AI embedded in critical infrastructure with NIS2 cybersecurity governance overlap

Adeptiv AI

Multi-jurisdiction compliance coverage for telecoms across national regulatory environments. Real-time monitoring for AI systems embedded in network operations.

Modulos AI

NIS2 integration directly relevant for critical infrastructure operators. Shadow AI detection addresses unsanctioned adoption in large operational workforces.

💻

Enterprise SaaS & Technology

Governance velocity to match rapid product development cycles

Adeptiv AI

AI lifecycle governance for SaaS organizations building or deploying AI. Real-time monitoring for production AI features. 38+ regulations for vendors serving multiple regulated industries.

Modulos AI

GRC agent automation matches development velocity. Developer-friendly integrations with GitHub, Jira, and Confluence. Scout's evidence search across code repositories addresses software development evidence needs.

AI Adoption Is Outpacing AI Governance.

AI governance is not a tool implementation. It's an organisational transformation.

We combine the most comprehensive AI governance platform with the expert implementation, training, and continuous programme support that make governance actually work inside your organisation.

Request A Demo

Frequently Asked Questions

Questions frequently raised by CIOs, CISOs, and compliance leaders during AI governance platform evaluation.

Adeptiv AI is built around unified operational AI lifecycle governance — connecting inventory, risk assessment, compliance documentation, and real-time production monitoring in one integrated platform across 38+ regulations. The architecture prioritizes end-to-end lifecycle continuity.

Modulos AI is built around a Governance Graph — frameworks, requirements, controls, and evidence connected in one structured data model. The architecture prioritizes GRC efficiency: one control satisfying multiple frameworks simultaneously, automated by AI agents that compress control assessment and evidence processing.

One optimizes for lifecycle governance breadth and regulatory coverage depth. The other optimizes for GRC efficiency and quantitative risk reporting velocity.
Both platforms cover EU AI Act compliance. Adeptiv AI includes the EU AI Act within its 38+ regulation framework with specific support for high-risk AI system governance under Annex III classifications, particularly for BFSI use cases. Modulos AI has pre-built EU AI Act framework mappings with continuous runtime inspection maintaining compliance posture in real time.

The key differentiation: if EU AI Act compliance sits alongside broader multi-jurisdictional obligations (BFSI or healthcare regulations beyond the EU), Adeptiv's regulatory breadth is advantageous. If EU AI Act sits within a cluster of overlapping EU obligations — NIS2, DORA, GDPR, ISO 42001 — Modulos's Governance Graph eliminates duplicate implementation work.
Both platforms address BFSI AI governance from different angles. Adeptiv AI has documented industry-specific use cases for credit risk governance and investment advisory AI, with audit-ready documentation designed for regulatory examination defensibility. Its 38+ regulation coverage includes sector-specific financial resilience frameworks like DORA and the Data Protection Act 2023 beyond the EU.

Modulos AI covers DORA and NIS2 alongside EU AI Act — directly relevant for EU financial institutions with overlapping ICT and AI regulatory obligations. Monetary risk quantification aligns naturally with financial risk management reporting standards.

If regulatory examination readiness from financial regulators is the priority, Adeptiv's BFSI focus is a clear advantage. If managing overlapping EU financial obligations with quantitative risk reporting is the priority, Modulos's architecture is more directly applicable.
Modulos AI quantifies AI risk in monetary terms — EUR, CHF, or USD — using Monte Carlo simulation to model complex interdependent risks and produce probability distributions rather than point estimates. A Risk Agent automates quantification using Fermi estimation, auditing its own reasoning before delivering results. Organizations define risk appetite limits and receive automated alerts when AI projects exceed allocated risk budgets.

Adeptiv AI uses gap analysis-based risk assessment integrated into the governance workflow, with risk classifications tied to regulatory obligations and lifecycle status. This approach serves compliance-led organizations where risk assessment primarily informs documentation and audit readiness rather than financial risk reporting to boards or risk committees.
Modulos AI has a dedicated Shadow AI module addressing six detection surfaces: naive employee usage of consumer AI tools, convenience-driven bypass of approved AI, senior-level defiant usage, AI embedded in already-approved SaaS tools (estimated at ~70% of AI interactions by 2026), autonomous agents taking unsanctioned actions, and vendor-supplied AI in existing software. Detection signals are mapped to EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIS2, and DORA.

Adeptiv AI includes organization-wide AI inventory discovery that encompasses unregistered systems within the broader lifecycle governance workflow. Where shadow AI detection is the primary governance concern, Modulos's more explicit multi-surface framework is purpose-designed for that specific problem.
This depends on the nature of the overlap. Adeptiv AI is stronger for organizations managing diverse global obligations spanning different regulatory geographies — multinational banks, global insurers, international manufacturers with obligations across EU, U.S., APAC, and other jurisdictions simultaneously. Its 38+ regulation coverage reduces multi-jurisdictional complexity at scale.

Modulos AI is stronger for organizations managing overlapping EU-centric or international framework clusters — EU AI Act + ISO 42001 + NIST AI RMF + NIS2 + DORA. The Governance Graph is specifically designed to eliminate duplicate implementation work, making compliance a natural byproduct of a single control implementation rather than a parallel workstream for each framework.